Comments on: The GymGo-er Who Lost RM2000 In The Gym Locker http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/ The Jolene Mentality - Shameless, Disgusting, Silliness. Tue, 15 May 2012 12:51:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Slim tea http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-18615 Slim tea Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:21:45 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-18615 <strong>Slim tea...</strong> Acne Info Today Recent Comments jojo on 101 tips to lose weight quickly Kstone on Caralluma- Appetite Suppressant SOME ONE on Jillian Michaels back on Biggest Loser rafael on Fat loss for idiots-... Slim tea…

Acne Info Today Recent Comments jojo on 101 tips to lose weight quickly Kstone on Caralluma- Appetite Suppressant SOME ONE on Jillian Michaels back on Biggest Loser rafael on Fat loss for idiots-…

]]> By: s0hp0h http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13482 s0hp0h Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:46:52 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13482 it's common that whatever service we use, often they provider won't be responsible for any losses.. which in a consumer's point of view - it's so wrong.. anyhow.. in this case, the dude obviously is at fault, but the company shouldn't just throw out their responsibilities like that.. it happens in their place and they should in any way, try to assist the victim as much as possible. Or else, would would anyone pay so much for those services - it's expected of them to help us, not like we're asking them to pay us back, duh! It's negligence! sue them sue them *chants* hahaha.. it’s common that whatever service we use, often they provider won’t be responsible for any losses.. which in a consumer’s point of view – it’s so wrong.. anyhow.. in this case, the dude obviously is at fault, but the company shouldn’t just throw out their responsibilities like that.. it happens in their place and they should in any way, try to assist the victim as much as possible. Or else, would would anyone pay so much for those services – it’s expected of them to help us, not like we’re asking them to pay us back, duh! It’s negligence! sue them sue them *chants* hahaha..

]]> By: sewjin http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13413 sewjin Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:01:50 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13413 my motorcycle recently got stolen. i'm sorry to say that it's always our own fault that our stuff disappears. my motorcycle recently got stolen. i’m sorry to say that it’s always our own fault that our stuff disappears.

]]> By: luzzio http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13410 luzzio Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:00:36 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13410 tan: yup, it really does. =D but i prefer defending the underdog for the sake of fun. tan: yup, it really does. =D but i prefer defending the underdog for the sake of fun.

]]> By: paul http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13395 paul Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:55:30 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13395 Literally. Wtf is the cctv facing the workers for? And if burglary of the lockers is a recurring problem, shouldn't something have been done about it ages ago? True, he signed the agreement and combo locks were not recommended. But the whole thing about metal objects in saunas and such, there is a valid point being made. The whole thing about lodging a police report, having to consult their superiors in HongKong via email (for GOODNESS'S SAKES!!!!), la la la, it's basically a way of frustrating the customer so much that they would give up the fight to get compensation. Call it red tape? Why not call it the official way to lose customers. Frustration in the person's case, IMHO, stems from the fact that the staff are doing bloody nothing to help the poor guy out. For goodness's sakes, RM2000 is a heck of a lot of money to lose. If one of the staff was to lose that amount of money, s/he would turn the whole place upside down to find it. Sheesh. What a shit gym that is. Literally.

Wtf is the cctv facing the workers for? And if burglary of the lockers is a recurring problem, shouldn’t something have been done about it ages ago?

True, he signed the agreement and combo locks were not recommended. But the whole thing about metal objects in saunas and such, there is a valid point being made.

The whole thing about lodging a police report, having to consult their superiors in HongKong via email (for GOODNESS’S SAKES!!!!), la la la, it’s basically a way of frustrating the customer so much that they would give up the fight to get compensation. Call it red tape? Why not call it the official way to lose customers.

Frustration in the person’s case, IMHO, stems from the fact that the staff are doing bloody nothing to help the poor guy out. For goodness’s sakes, RM2000 is a heck of a lot of money to lose. If one of the staff was to lose that amount of money, s/he would turn the whole place upside down to find it.

Sheesh. What a shit gym that is.

]]> By: Shaik Azrin (Mlights) http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13385 Shaik Azrin (Mlights) Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:38:14 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13385 The victim may lodge a claim at the Consumer Triunal or Tribunal Pengguna as it is commonly known. The disclaimer would not be valid if he goes to the tribunal. I am sure the Tribunal will order the Gym to compensate his loss. The victim may lodge a claim at the Consumer Triunal or Tribunal Pengguna as it is commonly known. The disclaimer would not be valid if he goes to the tribunal. I am sure the Tribunal will order the Gym to compensate his loss.

]]> By: Dr. Tan http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13383 Dr. Tan Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:09:51 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13383 Well, while Mervyn has a point there about not reading it, I think the fact that they cannot bring metallic items into the sauna somewhat makes the clause disputable. But then again my contracts was just a summary of it, not an in depth, detailed study. Well, while Mervyn has a point there about not reading it, I think the fact that they cannot bring metallic items into the sauna somewhat makes the clause disputable.

But then again my contracts was just a summary of it, not an in depth, detailed study.

]]> By: luzzio http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13374 luzzio Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:48:12 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13374 anyway, as long as the notice/agreement as to CF being not responsible for losses, and even not recommending a key lock, no matter how frigging long, was presented, AND made sure noticed (for example don't put the notice under a chair or something wtf), and to place his property in the locker at his own risk, by the guy before he used the locker... then whether he decided to read it or not doesn't matter. it's his negligence in his part for not reading the notice. furthermore, arguing about whether he used a key lock or combination lock based on their recommendations doesn't really matter, since they did say they would not be responsible for any lost property. I think the legal point here is whether or not the notice was obvious enough to the victim that it (notice) was for terms of use on the locker. I'm guessing it most probably was. anyway, as long as the notice/agreement as to CF being not responsible for losses, and even not recommending a key lock, no matter how frigging long, was presented, AND made sure noticed (for example don’t put the notice under a chair or something wtf), and to place his property in the locker at his own risk, by the guy before he used the locker… then whether he decided to read it or not doesn’t matter.

it’s his negligence in his part for not reading the notice. furthermore, arguing about whether he used a key lock or combination lock based on their recommendations doesn’t really matter, since they did say they would not be responsible for any lost property.

I think the legal point here is whether or not the notice was obvious enough to the victim that it (notice) was for terms of use on the locker. I’m guessing it most probably was.

]]> By: luzzio http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13373 luzzio Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:36:47 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13373 That's why you see car parks having "Park at your own risk" signs... companies are more powerful than the individual consumer. Customer may be king, but then again, you're probably not worth rm2000 to them as an individual with your membership... I say lodge a report to The Star. =D The Star = everybody listen to what it says. This post reminds me of my contract law case studies... *sigh* exams exams. That’s why you see car parks having “Park at your own risk” signs…

companies are more powerful than the individual consumer. Customer may be king, but then again, you’re probably not worth rm2000 to them as an individual with your membership…

I say lodge a report to The Star. =D

The Star = everybody listen to what it says.

This post reminds me of my contract law case studies… *sigh* exams exams.

]]> By: c.ho http://jayelleenelial.com/the-gymgo-er-who-lost-rm2000-in-the-gym-lockers/comment-page-1/#comment-13372 c.ho Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:19:38 +0000 http://jayelleenelial.com/?p=383#comment-13372 I mean, it's not exactly good PR to leave your customers on the lurch? Customer's king right? heheheh. I mean, it’s not exactly good PR to leave your customers on the lurch? Customer’s king right? heheheh.

]]>